5个项目管理中的冲突解决技术

解决冲突技术

Today we will discuss the five conflict resolution techniques that we use in project management to resolve conflict.

这些技术对于任何类型的工作场所都是普遍的。

However, in project management, the work environment is dynamic and stressful, unlike the functional environment. Conflicts are common occurrences. If you are managing项目, you know how important it is to manage conflicts, and that is why you should understand the conflict resolution techniques.

Conflict Resolution Techniques

When two or morestakeholders有不同的意见或兴趣,可能会发生冲突。

安排优先级,稀缺资源,技术原因和个人问题都可能导致冲突。b0b体育app根据美国管理协会的说法,管理人员花费了24%的时间管理冲突。

Don’t panic; the situation is usually not as bad as you think. Resolving conflicts appropriately can build trust and sometimes bring new ideas and opportunities. This can make the difference between a positive and negative outcome.

If you don’t solve the conflict, your team members will lose trust. It will weaken your position as a project manager and the ability of your team to bond, which may affect your project’s success. You must deal with conflict before it is beyond resolution.

The following are a few consequences of improper conflict management:

  • 低团队士气
  • Negative impact on the project manager’s authority
  • 数量的增加个人clashes
  • 低生产率和效率
  • Low-quality work

如果需要,项目经理必须尽快监视和解决冲突,以防止他们成为更大的问题。

现在,我们将讨论解决冲突的技术。

This blog follows the PMI guidelines and PMBOK Guide. Here are the five techniques:

  1. 提取/避免
  2. Smooth/Accommodate
  3. 妥协/调和
  4. Force/Direct
  5. Collaborate/Problem Solve

These conflict management strategies are also known as Thomas-Kilmann’s five approaches to resolving conflict.

让我们详细讨论每种技术。

#1。避免退出

在这个冲突解决技巧,你避免the conflict or retreat and allow conflict to resolve itself. This is for when stakes are low, and the conflict is likely to disappear on its own.

在以下情况下使用此技术:

  • 参与冲突的个人不是影响力相关者。
  • The issue does not require a time investment.
  • An intense argument has already happened, and the individuals need time to cool off.
  • You do not have enough information to pursue other techniques.

Advantages

这种技术节省了您可以在其他地方投资的时间。这是一种良好的冲突管理策略,可以应用于低级分歧,并为您提供足够的时间来准备冲突。

缺点

撤回或避免并不是真正的解决方案,不能解决冲突,并且可能会削弱您的立场,因为当事方可能会认为您有不公平的偏见。团队成员可能认为您缺乏技能或没有权威。

Many experts don’t consider this technique as a conflict management strategy, that avoiding and escaping is not a solution.

#2. Smooth or Accommodate

In this conflict resolution strategy, you find areas of agreement and try to smooth out the situation and circumvent tough discussions.

The smoothing technique gives more consideration to one party than the other. You downplay the seriousness and behave as the conflict never existed.

This technique is helpful in the following cases:

  • 您没有时间处理它。
  • You require a temporary solution to the problem.
  • The conflict is minor and involves less influential stakeholders.

Advantages

这种解决冲突策略不需要太多努力。您可以通过忽略不重要的论点来关注基本问题。可以在带来和谐,创造善意并提供足够的时间找到永久解决方案的同时简单地处理情况。

缺点

如果您未能带来平衡的方法,则一方可能会利用,因为您会给他们更多的考虑。其他没有被容纳的各方可能会质疑您的权威或停止报告冲突。

不建议采用这种解决冲突策略,因为它通常会削弱项目经理的权威。

#3. Compromise or Reconcile

In this conflict management strategy, you take suggestions from both sides and partially satisfy them. This technique is useful when the stakeholders involved hold equal power.

You may use this technique in the following cases:

  • All parties involved need to win
  • When you have an equal relationship with both parties
  • Collaborative and forcing techniques have failed
  • 当您需要临时解决方案时

Advantages

This technique brings quick results, lowers stress, and keeps all parties placated until you can find a permanent solution. You can cool off and revisit the situation later.

缺点

This conflict management technique does not generate trust in the long run; all parties remain unsatisfied, and the conflict could resurface at any time. Morals are not being strengthened. You may have to ensure all parties abide by the agreement.

#4. Force or Direct

In this conflict management strategy, you agree with one party’s viewpoint and enforce their wishes. This is a win-lose situation and risks demoralizing the team.

您可以在以下情况下使用这种冲突解决技术:

  • When you need a quick solution
  • 当您知道一个聚会是正确的
  • You do not have time to investigate
  • When the conflict is not very important
  • When the relationship with stakeholders is not essential

Advantages

该技术提供了一个快速解决方案。它几乎不需要项目经理的努力,这可能有助于建立他们的权威。

缺点

Using this technique may cause a negative impression on you. You may lose opportunities gained from the opposing party’s viewpoint. You cannot apply this technique with powerful stakeholders. It may backfire and worsen the conflict.

#5。协作或问题解决

In a collaborative conflict resolution strategy, you discuss the issue with all parties and agree on a solution while considering multiple viewpoints.

You may use this technique in the following cases:

  • 合并多个视图时
  • If influential stakeholders are involved
  • When a consensus is required
  • If you want to distribute responsibility

Advantages

This is a real problem-solving technique that provides a solution to the conflict. It brings consensus, commitment, and shared responsibility for the outcome. This technique creates a win-win situation, builds your team’s confidence, earns respect, and establishes your authority.

缺点

You cannot use this technique when you need a quick solution because it takes time and effort. It is generally used for conflicts that may affect your project, not all issues

Which Conflict Resolution Technique Should I Use?

The PMI does not recommend using any specific technique for all conflicts; it all depends on the situation and the stakeholders involved.

例如,如果两个地面工人有冲突,您该怎么办?

You may ignore it.

However, if you see that some important stakeholders have a conflict, you will intervene, solve the conflict, and spare your project from harm.

Although no single technique can be used for all conflicts, generally, it is thought that the “Collaborate or Problem Solve” method brings the most consensus and commitment.

如何防止冲突

You cannot keep all conflict from happening, but following a few rules can minimize it. These guidelines are:

  • Establish Strict Ground Rules:These help discipline team members which result in less conflict.
  • Have an Effective Communication Plan:This can help you avoid many conflicts. Define how much and how often you will communicate with your stakeholders.
  • Have a Better Stakeholder Management Plan:Your project is successful if your stakeholders are happy. Project management is all about managing stakeholders’ requirements.
  • 尽早解决冲突:This takes less time and effort. Make sure an unresolved conflict doesn’t resurface again later.

项目经理在解决冲突中的作用

I have explained all strategies to resolve conflicts and how you can use them. As a project manager, you have to respond rationally and reach a solution that best serves your objective.

While resolving a conflict, keep the following points in mind:

  • Each participant deserves respect
  • Be calm, and rational.
  • 人们与问题分开
  • Each participant should be listened to patiently
  • 总是有共识和分歧的领域
  • 您应该探索所有可能的解决方案。
  • Mind your biases and don’t pick sides
  • 不要强迫或压力参与者
  • 推迟冲突可能会恶化。
  • 专注于冲突,不要让问题升级或概括。

概括

As a project manager, you are responsible for keeping conflicts under control. You cannot use any single technique for all types of conflict. However, you should use a conflict resolution strategy that inspires consensus and commitment from team members.

这是有关冲突解决技术结束的博客文章。


Below is my old blog post on conflict resolution strategies based on the fourth edition of the PMBOK Guide. Since I have re-written it based on the sixth edition of thebob手机客户端, the old blog post is no longer relevant but I am keeping it archived.

“Conflict Resolution Techniques” was one of my favorite topics during myPMP certification exam preparation. Although, I observed a discrepancy between the PMP exam reference books and the PMBOK guide.

All the reference books suggested that confronting is the best conflict resolution technique and that a project manager should use this technique to resolve conflicts in all cases. However, the PMBOK Guide (fourth edition) favors the collaborative technique.

I have reviewed this edition of the PMBOK Guide repeatedly but I could not find any support for this.. To my surprise, nobody is discussing this discrepancy.

Therefore, I am launching my blog to address this issue, which is my first blog post.

Let’s get started.

Conflict happens while managing projects. The PMI recognizes this fact and they have incorporated conflict resolution techniques into the PMBOK Guide.

Sources of conflict include scheduling priorities, technical problems, personal issues, scarcity of resources, etc.

According to the PMBOK Guide (fourth edition), you can use six conflict resolution techniques to resolve conflicts:

  1. 提取或避免
  2. 平滑或包容
  3. 妥协
  4. Forcing
  5. Collaborating
  6. Problem Solving or Confronting

Now I will discuss each technique and the best conflict resolution, as per the PMBOK Guide.

  1. 撤回或避免:项目经理选择避免冲突,而参与人员找到解决方案。
  2. 平滑或适应:项目经理参与冲突,试图避免分歧和艰难的讨论领域,并专注于共同点。平滑是避免艰难讨论的一种方式。
  3. 妥协: This is a mid-way approach. Here, everybody gains some but no one gets exactly what they want. This is a lose-lose approach.
  4. 强迫:项目经理决定以一方为代价。该技术有可能使团队成员沮丧,并可能在将来造成严重的冲突。这是一种获胜的方法。
  5. 协作:项目经理与各方合作,找到涉及多个观点以创建最佳解决方案的决议。这种技术加强了相互信任和承诺。这是双赢方法的一个例子。

在《 PMBOK指南》的第四版中,协作和解决问题是不同的技bob手机客户端术。但是,第五和第六版是相同的技术。同样,解决问题在第四版中被称为面对,但它不再出现在当前的PMBOK指南中。bob手机客户端

A Note on Problem Solving or Confronting Technique

在面对技术中,项目经理必须找到解决冲突的解决方案。他将进行根本原因分析,为各方提供表达分歧并得出解决方案的平台。

So, Which is the Best Technique to Resolve a Conflict?

我已经回顾了许多书籍和互联网资源,以发现最佳的冲突解决技术。b0b体育app令人惊讶的是,我得到了相同的答案:面对或解决问题是解决冲突的最佳技术。

However, I do not agree with this.

The job of a project manager is not an easy one; they must constantly deal with multiple conflicts. No two conflicts are the same, so why would you always use one technique?

项目经理必须利用他们的判断力和经验来确定哪种冲突解决技术最适合每种情况。所选技术取决于情况,时机和所涉及的个人。

The primary objective of the project manager is to complete the project successfully.

A project manager is not a detective. It’s not their job to look for the root cause, dig every available detail and scraps of evidence, and then reach a conclusion.

有了解决问题的技术,一个人获胜,另一个人输了。这不是双赢的情况,即使他们错了,也会使一个政党不满意。

审慎的项目经理将试图避免这种情况,并寻找使各方满意的解决方案。合作的冲突解决技术,这是所有人的双赢局面。

让我们看看PMBOK指南说什么:bob手机客户端

第239页,第二段:

“If conflict escalates, the project manager should help facilitate a satisfactory resolution. Conflict should be addressed early and usually in private, using a direct, collaborative approach.”

Page-229, last paragraph:

“……以建设性的方式管理冲突,并鼓励协作解决问题和决策。”

No statement in the PMBOK Guide suggests using the problem solving/confrontation technique for all conflicts; however, I noticed that the PMBOK Guide recommends the collaborative technique.

PMI似乎也同意我!

My View

我不建议使用协作technique to solve all conflicts. However, it is the only technique that leads to consensus and commitment among all parties involved in the conflict.

冲突管理的策略取决于冲突。您可以使用您认为最适合解决冲突的技术。但是,我不同意面对面是最好的冲突解决技术,您不应该盲目使用它。

哪些冲突解决技术最大程度地帮助您解决冲突?请通过评论部分分享您的经验。


  • 主席先生,我真的赞成您的想法及其具有教育意义,请先生,先生,应使用哪种技术来解决土地上的冲突。

  • what the role as the PM or team member if conflict start to effect core project or one constrains should i start interfere to solve it or ask them to solve it by them self.

  • 感谢您的笔记和问题库。bob官网竞彩足球您的笔记确bob官网竞彩足球实启发了我如何学习PMP考试,我昨天通过了它。

  • Hi Fahad,
    I failed my first test and preparing for the second one.I prepared well with lot of material including PMBOK. But,i am unable to justify my weak areas.I purchased your 400 questions and scored 80% .Practiced well in all the areas.Can you advise me please?

  • Is I have to explain again the need of new requirements to members, which technique should I use? And when we are discussing alternative which one? I found the blog quite clear but to be honest I fail to differentiate when to use collaboration and compromise. Pls can you help me

    • 妥协是相对较快的过程,您可以从双方提出建议并得出结论。

      In collaborative approach you have a detailed discussion with both parties to reach on a best solution.

  • 也许您是对的,但我认为所有策略都是为了工作,在我的情况下,妥协是我的最佳选择。谢谢您的材料。

  • Hello Fahad,

    I successfully completed the exam and now Certified PM :) I want to thank you for these notes that really helped me understand the processes better in simpler terms. You are great teacher! I had purchased your formula guide and EVM guide as well which was immense help as well. Thank you and God bless you.

  • Hello Fahad,

    Your blog is great help. I am currently preparing for my PMP exam. Every time I am stuck or fail to understand a term/usage/formula, I come here and your explanation(s) helps me understand it. I want to thank you for that. And I also appreciate that you update your notes when there is a new edition of PMBOK. So this is a great reference site for people like me preparing to give their exams. Best

    • 欢迎您Hazra。现在,PMBOK的六版将于明年到来,所以我将再次更新它们。

      谢谢for your comment.

  • Hey Fahad,
    谢谢for your awesome notes. I also purchased the question set on Kindle.
    Helped me clear the test on first attempt.

    Regards,
    阿莫尔

  • Can I please ask this question?

    Is problem solving the most effective, sustainable conflict resolution technique?
    Please provide reasons to substantiate your response.
    逐点讨论您的意见。谢谢

  • 你好,

    我确实看到了来自冲突解决技术的模拟考试中出现的3到5个问题。它们彼此之间非常相似。但是,我犯了平滑/适应性,妥协/对帐以及力量/直接,撤回/避免之间的错误。

    判断变得艰难且以上解释很长,回忆/记住。在这种情况下,是否有可能为一种不同的情况提供一种与5个冲突解决技术相匹配的情况?

    非常感谢。

    Regards,
    内存Narayan

  • I checked the PMOBOK fifth ed. and as you mention, but I also noticed the word confront (in pencil) near the word collaborate. I remembered that our instructor told us they have same meaning.

  • Fahad,

    另一个不错的帖子。实际上,冲突管理技术也是我最喜欢的话题。

    However, I am unable to get – how compromise is loose-loose. Wont it be loose-win, even if temporary?

    • In compromise both parties have to give up something to reach on a common consensus.

      (请注意,本文基于第四版的第四版,第五版,PMI已合并了协作和解决问题的技术。)bob手机客户端

  • 大家好
    哪一种是最坏的冲突解决方法?我认为它是:强迫/导演,但是我看到的地方倡导撤回/避免的地方是最糟糕的。请分享您的想法。

  • 你好,

    In PMBook 5th edition, collaborating and problem solving are given as synonyms. As for confronting it disappeared, however I just did the exam and it is still the term they use for this. The way I see it, confronting is the same general ideology than collaborating and problem solving, all seeks win-win situation.

    这是第五版的摘录:
    “解决冲突有五种通用技术。由于每个人都有其位置和使用,因此没有以任何特定顺序给出”
    […]
    “Collaborate/Problem Solve. Incorporating multiple viewpoints and insights from differing perspectives; requires a cooperative attitude and open dialogue that typically leads to consensus and commitment.”

    我还认为面对/解决问题/协作的潜在客户是最佳解决方案。与生活中的许多其他事物一样,考虑到约束而不是最好的结果,我们通常必须选择最佳结果。

    Confronting is not a win-lose, its aim at win-win. you confront ideas of both party and the aim (the very reason why it’s time consuming) is by sharing actively their point of view, a common agreement will emerge (which can be to agree about one or the other party position or on a new position). Since it must be common agreement, it can only be win-win (unless it is a disguised compromise because one of the party pretend to agree). It is really the equivalent of collaborating/problem solving.

    • In the fourth edition of the PMBOK Guide, confronting and collaborative approach were different, now they are synonyms….

  • I’m sorry. Read the PMBOK again, and your sources. The PMBOK and PMI reinforce that the book is a “best practices” book, every management book is; take great care to understand and internalize that because the real world is quite different. No credible source can provide us with the “one and only” way, or the best way for all management situations.

    The PMBOK does not say (quoting you) “applying the same technique to all conflicts” would be justified.

    It actually says the opposite, which ironically is the case your’re making. “…each one has its place and use,”. For example, avoiding a problem, can be VERY effective in certain situation; particularly on a “high functioning” team.

    现在,您对面对最佳成果的行业共识是正确的,通常是作为有利的方法……是!您只需要知道何时有机会使用它以及如何使用它。

    (I’m a PMP and a “seasoned” Construction PM) Good luck to you!

    • 我应该添加;合作和面对面是从相似之处交叉的。那可能会让你困惑。如果您阅读Thomas-Kilman冲突模式工具;协作的定义非常接近面对面。正确诊断问题并齐头并进。

      However, collaboration is less optimal since it takes time. Every time a conflict comes up; there’s not always time to have a campfire and roast marshmallows. I think the PMBOK is trying to show that finding the root problem, is not always an outcome of collaboration.

      • Hello eh,

        你之前这么说:

        ‘No credible source can provide us with the “one and only” way, or the best way for all management situations.’

        I am agree with you on it.

        Again you’ re saying:

        The PMBOK does not say (quoting you) “applying the same technique to all conflicts” would be justified.

        I’m totally agree with you here again, and in fact to prove this point I wrote this blog post. In this blog post I’m only trying to say that PMBOK does not say that you should apply one technique on all conflicts.

  • 我同意协作是最好的解决方案,最终也涉及根本原因,并且在每个人中都可以买到,这是一个永久的解决方案,而不是面对/解决问题。

    为了获得很少的分数,我们必须选择面对面!

  • 我觉得法哈德是对的。协作是解决冲突的最佳技术。在大多数实际情况下,我们都需要所有团队成员在没有任何怨恨的情况下相处 /参与。这种技术通常有助于将所有团队成员带入目标,而不会伤害个人的自尊心。面对面不能赢 - 永远赢。我认为技术的用法取决于情况和项目经理的理解。

  • Hello,

    thank you for this post.
    我真的很喜欢它。
    Although I am still not sure I fully understand the difference between confonting and collaborating. Are there any specific features of these techniquest that can help differentiate them clearly?
    Currently, I have a feeling that Confronting and Collaborating are almost the same thing

    • 在协作中,您将多个观点结合在一起,并协商最佳解决方案。这是一种胜利方法,另一方面,面对问题的技术。在面对问题时,您会找到问题的根本原因,然后到达其解决方案。面对胜利的情况。

      • Hello Fahad,

        I was going through the above comments where you mentioned that confronting is a win-lose situation. But if go by Rita Mulcahy , she mentioned confronting as Win-win situation.
        即使在某些多项选择问题中,它也被认为是双赢的情况。您能帮您更好地理解这一点吗?提前致谢。

        Regards,
        加根

          • Not exactly. 2 people may be, dont have any right path, they go to discussion/argument to figure out what is the best way to deal with the conflict.

            面对/解决问题包括:
            – Find the root cause of problem, not what is presented to you or what appears to be the problem
            – Analyze the problem
            - 确定解决方案
            – Pick a solution
            - 实施解决方案
            - 查看解决方案并确认解决方案可以解决问题。

            因此,面对双赢的情况。获胜情况是指强制解决方案(1胜,1输)

            • Two team members are having conflict, most of the time one is correct and other is wrong.

              在这种情况下,如果你去面对,那么obviously the person who is in right path will win and other loses.

  • Collaborating does not necessarily fix the problem and may show up again, only Confronting does this, it gets to the “root cause”

    • Yes, you are right but it does not mean that the project manager should always go for confronting.

      A project manager has to decide that which technique suits best to the situation.

  • 当PM向团队成员建议对当前问题做出各自的利弊,然后建议他们讨论它们时,使用了哪种技术。这是协作还是面对面?

    • It depends on what resolution he takes at the end. If he combines multiple view point and find the best agreeable solution, then it will be collaborative. And if he takes resolution of conflicts based on only facts then it will be confronting.

      • You may be right but only discussion does not mean that he will chose the confronting. He may also go with the collaborative technique or try to smooth the situation. All depends on the situation and problem at the hand.

  • I like your post very much and am in a project management class right now. Although confronting has a negative connotation, it is not always such. Confronting a problem and dictating how it should be resolved is the PM's job and if the other techniques do not work this approach should be taken. PM'S will run into personalities that will have a conflict with everything or everyone. Taking a direct confrontational approach may be required and should not be seen as a negative componant. Your assessment is great and accurrate.

  • {“电子邮件”:“电子邮件地址无效”,“ url”:“网站地址无效”,“必需”:“必需字段丢失”}

    Recommended Resources

    将这些资源用于PMPb0b体育app认证考试准备,并以最少的精力通过考试。

    PMP培训计划


    The PMI approved 35 contact hours training program that is 100% online, affordable, and help you prepare the PMP exam.

    The PMP Exam Preparation Tool


    A PMP exam preparation course, that is 100% online and provide you everything you need to pass the PMP exam.

    >