Precision and accuracy are characteristics of measurement, which plays an important role in quality management. If the collected measurements do not meet the requirements, the deliverable cannot be accepted and is said to be of poor-quality.
You analyze the collected data for the accuracy and precision of the deliverable. If the measurements are accurate and precise, you will accept the deliverable. Otherwise, you will ask for corrective action.
A perfectly acceptable deliverable must be accurate and precise.
精密度和准确度往往错误地assumed to be synonyms of each other. Therefore, let me clarify our understanding of these quality management concepts.
Precision
Measurements are precise when the values of repeated measurements are clustered and have less scatter.
Precise measurements are not necessarily close to the target value, it just means that the results are close to one another. These measurements may or may not be near the target value.
据说,当散射量很小时,测量值是高精度的。
A Real-World Example of Precision
Assume that you received an order to supply 10,000 rods, 10 meters in length, to your client. You started production, and during the quality inspection, you randomly measure five rods.
The length of each rod is as follows:
如果您分析这些测量值,您会注意到它们不接近目标(10米),但彼此非常接近。它们的长度几乎没有差异,因此它们的测量值很小。
In this case, the measurements are precise.
Precision is a measure of the variation among values.
准确性
准确性is defined as how close the measured values are to the target value.
Scatter doesn’t have a significant role here. Accurate measurements may or may not be close to one another in a scatter. In other words, accurate data does not have to be precise, but it is ideal.
A Real-World Example of Accuracy
Let us consider the example discussed earlier. From a production lot, you randomly pick five rods for a quality inspection. You measure their lengths, and the dimensions are as follows:
You can see that all measurements are very close to the target length of the rod, which is 10 meters. Although, the values are closer to the target value, they are not close to each other and scatter is high.
So, you can say that these measurements are accurate but not precise.
You may be wondering which characteristic of measurement is more desirable.
The answer is “accuracy.”
This is because all data are close to the actual value, which is the sign of correctness of a deliverable. However, the best case is if the measurements are precise as well, because the measurements are close to the target value and very close to each other.
精度和精度之间的区别
精度和精度之间存在一些差异:
- Accurate data are close to the target value, while precise data are close to each other.
- 准确性is always desired while precision is desirable when it is coupled with accuracy.
- 准确的数据可以精确,而精确的数据可能准确或可能不准确。
- 精度和准确性彼此独立。
- 一种测量足以使其准确性,而精度需要许多测量。
The Significance of Accuracy and Precision
Measurements are important for quality management. If the measurements are precise as well as accurate, you can say that the product is defect free.
However, if the measured data is neither precise nor accurate, the product is defective; i.e. it is lacking correctness and exactness at the same time, and you have to takecorrective and preventive action.
概括
Precision and accuracy are vital quality management concepts. Accuracy is about closeness to the required value while precision measures repeatability. Precision alone is as important, unless it is coupled with accuracy. It is not necessary for precise measurements to be accurate or accurate measurements to be precise. Precise measurements can be accurate or inaccurate, and accurate measurements can be precise or imprecise.
It is the responsibility of the project management team to decide the level of accuracy and precision for their project deliverables during the quality inspection.
These topics are important from aPMP exampoint of view; therefore, you must know these concepts well and understand the differences between them.
I hope I have clarified a few things to you. If you have any thoughts or feedback, please share it through the comments section below.
Image credit =>NOAA’s National Ocean Service
So clear.
谢谢, Subrata.
出色的!
谢谢,Rachita。
If there is a toss up between precision and accuracy, which will be more important for measuring instrument?
Precision is useless with accuracy. We want product to be accurate.
出色的解释。
谢谢Hema for your comment.
Clearly described with examples, easy to understand. Thanks
You are welcome Harikrishnan.
感谢您澄清准确和精确的,这清除了所有混乱!祝贺你!
You are welcome Linda.
Fahad, please explain accuracy and precision in terms of control chart also by giving an example. How values are scattered across mean and when should we say they are accurate and mean. And when the process has to be adjusted and when to be improved.
控制图表图链接:http://www.oliverlehmann.com/contents/free-downloads/175_pmp_sample_questions.pdf
o The process has high precision but low accuracy. It should be adjusted.
o The process has high precision but low accuracy. It should be improved.
o该过程的精度很高,但精度较低。应该调整它。
o该过程的精度很高,但精度较低。It should be improved.
In future when I update this blog post, I’ll this information as well.
superb !!!!!
谢谢Vivek。
我喜欢这篇文章。谢谢
You are welcome Sakinah.
You are really good
:)
Good stuff! thank you!!
You are welcome Bukola.
Very helpful indeed. You make these concepts and definitions very easy to understand.
上帝祝福你。
感谢NDEH的评论。
Explanation is superb and easy to understand. My query, to calculate scatter, max value-min value of compared items. – is it correct?
You need to see the density of scatter.
excellent article!
Can you please also elaborate when should I improve my process and when should I adjust?
If the process is precise but not accurate you should adjust it but if the process is neither accurate nor precise you should improve it.
谢谢Fahad. Very good explanation and article.
You are welcome Shankar.
很有帮助!谢谢
You’re welcome Joy.
Good explanation Fahad Usman..thanks for it
You are welcome Tuba.
谢谢its very elaborated description
谢谢Atul for you comment.
谢谢, it was perfect description , I have been confused with this two :)
You’re welcome Maryam.
Thank Mukta for your visit.
thanks
Very clear. Wonderful.
谢谢for posting
You’re welcome Andres, and thanks for your visit.
谢谢for this wonderful website. My only suggestion is that you group all various under their respective Knowledge area so anytime we visit it will be easy to make reference. Million thanks
You can find it here:
//www.utahfilmbank.com/archive/
Good examples and explanation, but can you please elaborate the below:
in your first example where results are 10.490, 10.495, 10.500…. can we say it is both accurate and precise as result is close to 10.
Similarly in the second example, 9.8, 9.9 and so on… can we still say it is precise and accurate??? as again values are less scattered (in the given sample) and close to 10?
另外,如果您可以澄清另一个问题,我将不胜感激。(根据奥利弗·莱曼(Oliver Lehmann)的问题)…175个问题的QS.9http://www.oliverlehmann.com/contents/free-downloads/175_pmp_sample_questions.pdf
the options are “process should be adjusted” or improved… the correct answer goes with adjusted…
i want to know if there is any rule of when to adjust or improve? this is not clear at all and i can’t find any good reference :(
在我的第一个示例中,所有值均接近10.5米意味着它们是精确的(请注意,所需长度为10.00 m)。尽管它们不接近目标长度。
In second example, values are moving around 10.0 meters, meaning they are close to the target length but not very precise (they are not very close to each other).
Very nice post
its excellent article
Excellent post. Especially the pictorial representation.
谢谢for stopping by and liking my post.